Author Archive

Liberals are open-minded? Far from it.

Posted: September 23, 2011 by aquasac in Smell These with Aqua Sac

Today, an article from Fox News tells us that a boy in Fort Worth was suspended from school for two days because he told a classmate that he believes homosexuality is wrong. Wow. This is the fascist/authoritarian Leftist mindset of today. If one doesn’t prescribe to the ideology of the Left, he is a heretic. He deserves to be punished; punished for having an opinion differing from that of cultural Marxists and anti-traditionalists.

Notice, the story doesn’t say that the boy said anything disparaging about homosexuals, just that in his opinion, he thinks it’s wrong.

Imagine if a student were to say “heterosexuality is wrong”. He would not be punished. He would probably be asked to keynote the graduation ceremony. This is what the Left continues to do today; punish, silence, pounce on anyone with whom they disagree labeling them a bigot, racist, homophobe, etc.

Can you imagine being suspended for holding an opinion that a vast majority of the world holds as well? As I’ve previously stated: the Left promulgates the lie stating they are the most open-minded people, when in fact, they are the least.

UPDATE:  The school has now revoked the suspension. I guess they figured they don’t want to be seen as fascist bigoted intolerant assholes they accuse people like me of being.

Not the hedgehog

Posted: September 22, 2011 by aquasac in Smell These with Aqua Sac

Just a bit of random information that will save you money, but bust your bladder.

We are all familiar with Sonic’s 44 oz Route 44 (is it “root”, or “rouwt”, I don’t know). We all love Sonic ice too. It’s like, it’s like, like, I don’t know. Ooh, like the feeling of droppin’ a deuce after walking 200 yards, with each step enticing that prairie dog to peak out a little more until it’s about to fall out of it’s cave when you plop yourself on the cold seat of the crapper. Yeah, that’s how good, refreshing and satisfying Sonic ice is.

Anyway. . . I did an experiment. I had a cup of Route 44 Sonic ice and a 20 oz bottled Coke. I poured the 20 oz Coke into the “44 oz” drink, only to find that with all that ice, it doesn’t even hold 20 oz of Coke. What a gimmick!

So, my point is, if you don’t know, to ask for “easy ice” when you get a Sonic drink. It’s still plenty of ice, and you get a lot more for your money.

Good ol’ fashioned racism

Posted: September 22, 2011 by aquasac in Smell These with Aqua Sac

My dad recently sent me a video of an ad campaign by the group Change Comes Slow. The video illustrates a common exclusion of Whites a propos the intolerance of racial slurs. In the following video, we are told not to use the terms “nigger”, “spic”, “chink”, “fag”, “kike”, and “retard”. Missing something?


Nowhere do you see “you can’t call me a cracker just because I’m White”. Why can’t prejudices against Whites be presented along side the prejudices against other races?

The omission of racial epithets towards Whites is glaringly obvious and is perhaps a subconscious, but more likely a tacit admission that White racial slurs are not out-of-bounds.

Two Whites are present in the video: a Jew and a homosexual. I suspect these were intended to be the Whites used in order to fulfill the diversity requirement so detractors cannot cause a fuss. But, the slurs are not directed at the White race in either case, but religion (and if you describe Jewish as a race, that’s separate than European whites)  and sexual orientation. It becomes more obvious when Jane Lynch, now known for her role on Glee, says:

The ‘R’ word is the same as every minority slur. Treat it that way, and don’t use it.

“The same as every minority slur”. This is further proof that racial slurs are only disparaging when minorities are the recipient. “Honky” or “Cracker” are not minority slurs, therefore, they are not slurs at all. I can read it no other way due to the omission of these terms.

[Blogger OneSTDV recently posted his thoughts on Glee here. I can’t agree with him, but it’s a good read nonetheless]

My personal anecdotal evidence supports the same conclusion one gets from the commercial: Whites have no reason to become upset over slurs hurled by the mere fact that they are White, the majority. Note also the direness of the situation in Jane’s voice and her body language. It’s also no coincidence that they used a White person to give the sanctimonious speech. A social pet project like this is more powerful coming from someone who is seen to be part of the population that can only be the offender of racial slurs, and never the victim.

The same is true with other majority groups in America. Heterosexuals and Christians are the butt of acceptable mainstream condescension and ridicule. If these groups defend themselves and point out being verbally victimized by others, the typical response is “lighten up, it’s a joke”; or, to point to past grievances perpetrated against a minority with the purpose of the juxtaposition showing a pale comparison. Because that act was worse, this act is okay. One improper behavior is justified by pointing to another, or more simply, two wrongs make a right.

This video pushes the same old story; Whites can’t be offended, as if they’re not human.

[Quick note: I must admit that while I know what a “kike” is, I’ve never heard it in person, only on television. I don’t know that this term is prevalent today, though this may only be due to me not growing up nor currently living in an area with many Jews.]

Hangliding: the new ipecac

Posted: September 15, 2011 by aquasac in Smell These with Aqua Sac

I always get a kick out of watching people puke. It makes me happy because, well, it’s not me. I always love when someone at a party starts puking in front of everyone. You feel sorry for the poor bastard, you want to go get him some water. But, if you get him water, you’re bound to miss more of the hilarious beans, sausage, turkey leg and cheese dip waterfall fertilizing your herb garden. Enjoy.

1984 was non-fiction

Posted: September 15, 2011 by aquasac in Smell These with Aqua Sac

You people should read this, a look into our own future here in the U.S. This is modern liberalism: fascist and/or authoritarian. You think thought crimes were just a made up thing in an Orwell book eh? Government is so great isn’t it? I mean, you on the Left want this. You really do. You may say you don’t, but when you support people like Obama, you are supporting this (if you didn’t know, HE’S collecting names too. We are almost an official police state.)

Within the next 20-40 years, there will be a complete breakup of the United States. There will be a revolution of some sort, IF, things like this continue to go on.

From Infowars:

Over 30,000 British schoolchildren, some as young as three, have had their names registered on a government database and branded “racist” or “homophobic” for using playground insults, infractions that could impact their future careers.

The shocking figures were disclosed after civil liberties group the Manifesto Club made a Freedom of Information Act request which betrayed the fact that kids who used petty jibes are now being treated as thought criminals by education authorities.

34,000 incidents of “racism” in total were reported for the year 2009-2010, with nursery school toddlers as young as three being put on a state database for using the words “gay” and “lesbian”. One child who called another “broccoli head” was also reported to authorities. Other cases included a child who used the word “gaylord,” while another who told a teacher “this work is gay,” was also added to the thought crime database.

The majority of the reported cases involved primary school children.

“The record can be passed from primaries to secondaries or when a pupil moves between schools,”

“And if schools are asked for a pupil reference by a future employer or a university, the record could be used as the basis for it, meaning the pettiest of incidents has the potential to blight a child for life.”

Schools are being pressured to report such incidents to authorities and face punishments for not doing so under anti-bullying policies.

This is a clear example of how hate crime laws have brazenly been hijacked by the state to get children institutionalized on criminal databases at an early age. This is about the state dictating what your child can think and say it’s the thought police on steroids.

Orwell talked about the state reducing language via Newspeak in his book 1984. By eliminating the very words that come out of children’s mouths and punishing them for thinking certain thoughts, all critical thinking is ultimately abolished, and Big Brother assumes the supreme power to dictate reality a dictatorship over our very minds.

Office Space: Gregory’s take

Posted: September 15, 2011 by aquasac in Smell These with Aqua Sac

When I get laid off in two weeks, there are a few things I won’t miss about the workplace. That is, the incredibly stupid, asinine, pointless, and cliché bull spit people spout off while walking by my desk. Yes, Mike Judge brilliantly portrayed this in Office Space, but I have a couple of my own here.

Example One:

While eating lunch at my desk, someone will inevitably come up and for some reason tell me what I’m eating, like I don’t know, or ask what I’m eating by saying what I’m eating in question form. “You’re eating salad?” Yes. Yes I am eating a salad. You have an incredible eye and an uncanny knack for titillating conversation. Now go away. (These are the same people who, upon hearing “Chick-fil-A”, immediately reply with “duh, they have the best chicken! But I only crave it on Sunday, der”.) It’s as if I’m supposed to be impressed that they, like everyone else on earth, know that the restaurant is closed on Sunday and can pick up on the fake irony you’re trying to portray.

Also, this person, no, these people (since it happens EVERY TIME, EVERY DAY) will say “are you on a diet or something” when I am eating something that is not loaded with sugar or fat, coated with gravy with gummy bears swimming in syrup. I mean, I don’t approach them on their lunch hour when they’re deep-throating a Sonic foot long and say “what, you’re NOT on a diet?” Now, go away.

To finish off example one, these folks sit there and talk to me while I’m trying to eat. Seriously. A tuna salad is not that interesting. We don’t need to go into which type of oil went into making the mayo, and I’m sorry your great aunt had a stroke. Now, go away.

Ooh, almost forgot. There’s a Muslim that sits next to me that only eats figs and baby infidels. Every time he sees me eating something that isn’t fruit, vegetables or some obscure Mediterranean shellfish delicacy, he says “that’s not healthy” in a supercilious manner, as if I either wanted his opinion on what I’m eating, or as if I was supposed to get approval prior to eating. This Muslim basically eats nothing. I swear. He is grumpy and seems not to enjoy life in the slightest. Perhaps if he downed a burger every once in a while, his dick would harden, I don’t know. But, what I do know is I might die at the age of 90 having eaten much enjoyable, make-your-keyboard-and-mouse-all-slippery greasy goodness, while he dies at 95 never having so much as butter as the non-stick medium for his eggs. (butter also goes well with baby Jews and onion. I got the recipe from a Muslim cookbook.)

Example Two:

You would think that because I work with NASA engineers, they would be smart and somewhat cultured. No, they are the same douches you see wearing UT Coach Polos anywhere else. These shirts say “yes, I went to UT, I didn’t play football but I do wear the same clothing as the coaches when I watch the games on TV therefore I’m part of that team, or actually, I’m BETTER than being a part of the team because I coach the team”. In reality, these were the guys who got dodge balls lodged in their taint in gym class which later explained their propensity for homo-erotic bromancing gayness in frat houses.

There’s a million other things I could get into if I could only remember.

Oh, let me say on more thing. What’s up with women in the workplace? Really. I’m sorry Rita allegedly gave you a “look” which you cannot prove. I don’t give a flying rat ballbag. Everyday, a woman is complaining about something, some perceived slight. I always put these in my file cabinet under “shit men never do in the workplace”. One, we don’t cry in the workplace. God dang. How uncomfortable is it to see someone crying in the workplace? Hold it together ladies, for Christ’s sake. And, just because you two ladies are cold, while the other 150 people are warm, doesn’t mean you get to turn up the heat. Majority rule. But, feminism taught women today that they are much more important than men, men are evil, and if we don’t agree to turn up the heat, it’s sexist and a complaint will be filed with HR.

HR! Don’t get me started. A whole department created to take complaints from women… whoops.

In Obama’s speech last night, he promulgated the idea of companies which hire a person who has been unemployed for six months or longer will receive a $4,000 tax break. Hmm, see anything wrong with this? Anything completely asinine? Anything that doesn’t make any sense whatsoever? My ten year old son can see it, but does the average American idiot voter see it?

This plan does not incentivize hiring in the least. It doesn’t make sense. If a company is not hiring, it’s because they either don’t have the funds to hire, or don’t need anymore employees, and these two normally work together. Let’s break it down.

Why would a company which has no money to hire anyone, hire someone for a tax credit? If the employee costs $30,000 a year, and they hire this person, they are in the red by $26,000. It would cost them $26,000 to receive $4,000. It’s like me saying to you “I’ll give you this $3 if you spend $20”. How does that make sense? It doesn’t.

The only companies who will receive this tax break are ones who are already hiring anyway. It will not spur economic growth, it will only cost the taxpayers more money.

I don’t think Obama understands how a business runs. He thinks they are holding back “bags of money”, as he says, for no reason but greed. Companies look out for their best interest, their bottom line. They only hire if needed due to demand of the product or service they’re selling. They don’t just hire people for the sake of giving someone a job. If they did, they wouldn’t be in business long. I mean, would you hire someone to cut your lawn even though you continue to cut it yourself? Just for the sake of feeling good about employing someone? Stupid. Obama doesn’t understand this.

Anyway, Obama will make it sound like he’s trying to “help” companies, in turn the economy, by offering this “incentive” to hire. His base will run with it. My only question is, does Obama REALLY think this is a workable solution, or is he just putting on a front to give the appearance of doing something, anything, knowing the average voter is a few cards short of a full deck and won’t look into it or think about it?